What Would / Will It Take to Bring Kershaw Back?

Thirty-three-year-old Dodgers left-hander Clayton Kershaw is a first-ballot Hall of Famer, of this you can be sure. But you can also be sure that the Dallas, TX native and Dodgers first-round draft pick in 2006 out of Highland Park High School in University Park, TX, is nowhere near the same pitcher that won three Cy Young Awards, was an eight-time All-Star, a National League MVP and Player of the Year, a Triple Crown winner, a five-time ERA champion, and a Gold Glove winner.

There really isn’t much more that Future Hall of Famer Clayton Kershaw can do that he hasn’t already done … except win another one of these, of course.
(Photo courtesy of USA Today)

Add to this the fact that Kershaw missed two and a half months of the 2021 regular season and the entire 2021 postseason due to elbow and shoulder injuries, and you have to question whether or not the Dodgers want to – or should – re-sign the now free-agent left-hander – Hall of Fame notwithstanding.

Although Dodgers President of Baseball Operations Andrew Friedman told reporters on Tuesday at the just-concluded General Managers meetings in Carlsbad, California that Kershaw will always have a place on the Dodgers roster if he wants one, the brutally painfully truth is that, again, Kershaw is nowhere near the pitcher that he once was, and that bringing him back – if he is even healthy enough to come back to begin what would be his 15th major league season – could amount to little more than burning a very valuable roster spot.

“We’ve made it very clear that if Kersh wants to come back, he will always have a spot with what he’s meant to this organization, not just looking back but with what we think he can do for us next year,” Friedman said on Tuesday. “I know he wants to take a little time with Ellen and figure out what’s best for them and also, more importantly, get to a point where he feels good health-wise. We have no reason to believe that he won’t. This would’ve accelerated the timeline.”

Dodgers President and CEO Stan Kasten and President of Baseball Operations Andrew Friedman have a very difficult decision to make regarding Clayton Kershaw. (Photo credit – Ron Cervenka)

Again, no one wants to hear that it may be time for Kershaw to hang up his cleats, but, again, it may be the painfully brutal truth that perhaps he should; and no one knows that more than Clayton Kershaw himself.

But what if he chooses not to retire and instead takes Friedman up on his offer of “…always [having] a spot…” on the Dodgers roster? What kind of price tag would that bring?

Putting all emotions aside for a second, the fact that Friedman didn’t even offer Kershaw an $18.4 million Qualifying Offer and the fact that Kershaw made $31 million for his injury-plagued 2021 season – the final year of his three-year / $93 million contract – suggests that the Cooperstown-bound lefty would probably have to give Friedman and the Dodgers what is often referred to as “a hometown discount.”

But to what end? How much is too much and how long is too long?

The obvious answer – if there is such a thing – is that Friedman would more than likely offer Kershaw an incentive-laden contract, perhaps based on innings pitched, wins, ERA, and strikeouts, of which he currently has 2,670 over his 14-year MLB career – all of them as a Dodger.

As of this writing and to our knowledge there has been no word from the Kershaw camp or any further word from Friedman and the Dodgers on this matter – or if such talks have even begun in earnest yet.

Stay tuned…

  *  *  *  *  *  * 

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “What Would / Will It Take to Bring Kershaw Back?”

  1. @Dodgers I’m afraid he will have the same problems that Cole Hammels. Saving all the distances.

  2. Drew Nelson says:

    Modern front offices won’t pay a premium for sentimental feelings. They won’t project Kershaw to be as valuable going forward as he was in the past, so I doubt he get a premium AAV. On an inning per inning basis he’s still quite productive, but that’s dependent on being on the field. If his elbow blows out in spring training it’d be tough to imagine him not retiring. I’d love for him to be a career Dodger. But paying him over $30million/season won’t help fill holes elsewhere on the roster. If Buehler and Julio are #1 and #2, much more than $20million for a number three might be a stretch. Maybe he’ll take a year off and be with his family and his let his arm heel.

    Similar situation for Scherzer. He’ll probably still get top AAV money since he was healthy most of the time. But that dead arm could be red flag. No QO and lots of teams looking for an ace will make him a hot commodity.

  3. OhioDodger says:

    First of all, it needs to be a contract in line with a #4 or #5 starter.
    Ace and #2 money is off the table. Whatever it takes to get Kersh resigned, it needs to be incentive and production based. Games started or innings pitched bonuses on a very low base salary. I don’t think his elbow, shoulder, and back are going to make it thru an entire season.

  4. Dan in Pasadena says:

    Regarding Kersh, OF COURSE we want him back.

    But why is no one writing the obvious: the platelet rich injection will at most hold off the inevitable and he will likely require Tommy John surgery sooner than later?

    Kersh is nothing if not smart and knows exactly what he has done, what he can still do and what he means to the organization. He will not expect an ace’s AAV, nor will he expect/agree to be paid like a typical #4 or #5. He has supreme confidence in his abilities tempered now by several year disappointments. He’ll accept a reasonable incentive laden contract at a price higher than a #4.

  5. jalex says:

    i would try to work out a 2+1 worth 45 w/ incentives to 60 (or a lower guarantee w/ higher incentives). i fully expect his elbow to blow, but would still like to see those 330K to get 3000

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress