Will Dodgers make a run at Jake Arrieta?

Make no mistake about it, Jake Arrieta is going to get paid … a lot. In fact, there have been reports that his agent Scott Boras, the man often referred to as ‘baseball’s Antichrist,’ sent teams a 75-page binder on behalf of his client informing them of what he has to offer, for which he is seeking a contract in the $200 million range.

Although Arrieta may not get the $200 million contract he is seeking, it’s probably safe to say that he will get very close to that amount. Will it be from the Dodgers? (Photo credit – Gene J. Puskar)

Should there be a team out there willing to take on such a contract, it would carry an average annual value (AAV) of $33.3 million for a six-year deal or $40 million for a five-year deal. But while there is little doubt that Guggenheim Baseball Management Group has this kind of money available, are they willing to spend it and jump right back into having to pay a ridiculously high MLB-leading luxury tax penalty for a sixth consecutive year?

Probably not.

When you consider that the Dodgers just dumped a combined $47.5 million by trading first baseman Adrian Gonzalez, left-hander Scott Kazmir and right-hander Brandon McCarthy (who are all in the final year of their respective contracts in 2018) in exchange for former Dodger Matt Kemp, who is still owed $21.5 million over each of the next two seasons, they would be right back where they were prior to unloading AGon’s, Kazmir’s and McCarthy’s salaries.

Although the Dodgers have made it abundantly clear that they are hoping to trade Kemp and the $43 million remaining on his 8-year / $160 million contract which runs through the 2019 season, it is also abundantly clear that, at this point, there isn’t a team out there willing to take on that kind of salary for a 33-year-old outfielder with noticeably declining defensive skills.

Taking this one step further, even if the Dodgers are unable to find a trade partner for the once-fan-favorite who fell from grace when he inferred that Los Angeles and San Diego were not real baseball towns, they have already hinted that they may simply designate Kemp for assignment, in hopes that some other MLB team will sign him as a free agent and at least give the Dodgers some payroll relief on the $43 million that they still owe him.

There is no disputing that Arrieta, who tossed a no-hitter against the Dodgers on August 30, 2015 on 115 pitches en route to winning the 2015 NL Cy Young award, would be the perfect right-handed partner for Dodgers ace left-hander Clayton Kershaw. But there is also no disputing that acquiring the soon-to-be 32-year-old (on March 6) Farmington, Missouri native could be the difference between the Dodgers returning to the World Series in 2018 or not.

Then again, with pitchers and catchers set to report for spring training on February 13, 2018, Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman and general manager Farhan Zaidi may simply roll the dice with who they already have on their existing 40-man roster when it comes time to set their starting rotation for their 2018 season opener on March 29 at Dodger Stadium.

That being said, how comfortable are you with this?

Stay tuned…

 

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Will Dodgers make a run at Jake Arrieta?”

  1. SoCalBum says:

    Just say NO to Arrieta and Boras. Long term, expensive deal for a pitcher whose stats, including declining velocity (per fangraphs), are headed in the wrong direction screams BAD CONTRACT! IF team believes it needs another veteran starting pitcher then look at acquiring someone like Gerrit Cole who will not saddle team with another horrible contract. No later than 2019 the Dodgers will have Maeda, Wood, hopefully Kershaw, along with Buehler, Urias, White, Oaks, et al for starting spots.

    • Boxout7 says:

      I’m with you, bad signing.

      Happily, I can’t see FAZ paying FULL retail for Arrieta AND giving up their 2nd and 5th highest draft picks in next years draft. At least that is what I think they would have to give up.

      FAZ is now ready to razzle dazzle us with their creative uses of money and prospects after getting out of luxury tax hell. Friedman said the recent trade set the organization up for the future, “a necessary strategic part of moves yet to come”. They won’t blow that on Arrieta.

  2. oldbrooklynfan says:

    With all that’s said and done, it would be great to have Arrieta, IMO.

  3. Respect the Rivalry says:

    Doesn’t make sense. Take away semi-season 2015B and even Boras wouldn’t have the nerve to ask such a price.

  4. baseball1439 says:

    A 75-page binder on what Arrieta has to offer, how about 1 page of the truth.A pitcher at age 32 with declining skills seeking 200M for 6 years.

    • Boxout7 says:

      Shhh, I am hoping the hated ones up north fall for the 75 page binder. I’d love watching them pay a 38 yr old Arrieta $33M as much as I enjoyed watching them pay Barry Zito his contract. Maybe more.

      • Ron Cervenka says:

        Sadly, these types of contracts are becoming the rule, not the exception … but I hear you.

        • Boxout7 says:

          You’re right, these types of contracts have been the rule, however, I read your essay on ticket prices rising, what over 25%. Something has to give. Maybe it’s just my imagination, but are teams moving a little slower this year in signing high priced free agents?

          Somebody will probably bite on the Arrieta/Boros 75 page binder (and later regret it) but I think Friedman is exploring/developing some different team building “rules”.

          Are Dodgers ticket prices really 27th out of 30th in cost? If true, they have to be the best bargain in MLB. Building a better mouse trap!

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress