If Puig gets All-Star snub, blame Ned Colletti

Like many Dodger fans, I was livid when Yasiel Puig was left off of the Dodgers opening day roster. I spent nearly three weeks in Arizona watching this kid have what was arguably the best spring training in MLB history – rookie or otherwise. But the bottom line is that it didn’t matter what Puig did in spring training, Dodger general manager Ned Colletti never intended to include Puig on the opening day roster – not ever.

“He’s too raw.” “Spring training numbers don’t count.” “He’s not ready.” “Nobody can keep up that pace.” I heard all of the excuses and the attempts to justify excluding Puig and I call BS – and I have all along.

Yasiel Puig went 30 for 58 (.517) with 5 doubles, 2 triples, 3 home runs and 11 RBIs in the team-leading 27 spring training games that he played in. (Photo credit - Ron Cervenka)

Yasiel Puig hit .517 (30 for 58) with 5 doubles, 2 triples, 3 home runs and 11 RBIs in the 27 spring training games that he played in. There was absolutely nothing more he could have done to make the team.
(Photo credit – Ron Cervenka)

Look at what the Dodgers have done since the day Puig arrived on June 3rd – they have gone 17-11. That’s .607 baseball, folks. And if you only look at the last 11 games, the Dodgers have won 10 of them. That’s .909 baseball, and no one… I mean no one can argue that it wasn’t the direct result of Yasiel Puig joining the team.

Granted, Hanley Ramirez’s return from the disabled list and the incredible numbers that he has put up since are every bit as impressive as Puig’s numbers, but everyone knows that it was the spark that Puig brought to the team (two weeks before Hanley’s return) that ignited the Dodgers incredible turnaround.

“It’s the kid, man… it’s the kid,” said Matt Kemp when asked by Charlie Steiner what has turned the Dodgers season around and fired them up.

I’m not big on playing the ‘what if’ game, but what if Puig had been on the Dodgers opening day roster? Where would they be in the standings today? And more to the point of this article, what would Puig’s numbers be? Even if you were one of the few who bought into Ned Colletti’s logic that they didn’t want Puig on the opening day roster so that his service time clock would start, he certainly could have (and should have) brought Puig up on May 10th instead of Scott Van Slyke. Between May 10th and June 2nd the Dodgers went 10-12. What would these numbers have been if Puig had been in the line-up during that time?

Now this is certainly not a knock on Scott Van Slyke who has done an outstanding job off the bench for the Dodgers, but what if the Dodgers had designated Luis Cruz for assignment on May 10th (as they should have) and brought both Puig and Van Slyke up? I’m guessing that the Dodgers would have done considerably better than 10-12 during that stretch.

If Puig had started the season in the Bigs or even if he had been called up earlier than June 3rd, guys like Bruce Bochy or the loud mouth (and ignorant) Jonathan Papelbon (among others) wouldn’t even be questioning or challenging Puig’s limited time in the Big leagues for All-Star consideration; his inclusion in the Mid-Summer Classic would have been a slam dunk instead of an annoying (and distracting) waiting game.

And it goes even deeper than this. Colletti’s reluctance to bring Puig up sooner could very well cost the 22-year-old Cuban defector a shot at the 2013 NL Rookie of the Year title or (Lord forbid) a shot at the 2013 NL MVP title – and for what? So Puig’s service time clock wouldn’t start earlier than they may have wanted? Nonsense, I say. The Dodgers signed Puig to a 7-year/$42 million contract for crying out loud. And even with the arbitration clause in the contract, the Guggenheim Baseball Management group would be foolish not to offer Puig a contract extension long before this clause would come into play.

And taking this yet another step further, if GBM really wants to win a championship ‘right now,’ as they have been telling us for over a year now, why did they allow Colletti to hold Puig back? One can only guess how many valuable wins this may have cost the Dodgers.

How many times did we hear Magic Johnson say that he wants to win a championship Right now? (Photo credit - Jon SooHoo)

How many times did we hear Magic Johnson say that he wants to win a championship ‘right now?’
(Photo credit – Jon SooHoo)

I’ll say it again, where would the Dodgers be in the standings today had Puig started the 2013 season on the 25-man roster or called up even only a month earlier than he was?

Common logic dictates that Puig needs to be on the 2013 NL All-Star team regardless of his short time in the majors. I mean really now, since MLB made the All-Star Game the deciding factor for home field advantage for the World Series, it is no longer just an exhibition game. One need look no further than the last three World Series to see how important home field advantage is – it’s huge. So it really boils down to whether Bruce Bochy wants to win the All-Star Game or not, and it is impossible to argue that having Yasiel Puig on his roster wouldn’t increase his chances of winning significantly.

Regardless, should Bochy decide not to select Puig as one of his final picks for the 2013 All-Star Game or should Puig fall short in The Final Vote (or should he miss out on the ROY or MVP titles), his blood will be on Ned Colletti’s hands.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “If Puig gets All-Star snub, blame Ned Colletti”

  1. ebbetsfld says:

    I’m not sure I wholly agree with you, Ron. I think the time at Chattanooga definitely helped Yasiel in two ways:
    1) He was able to play every day, and
    2) He was not subjected to the intense media scrutiny that he is now, obviously, quite able to handle.
    That’s not to say that we’d be in better shape in the standings had he started the season in LA, but it’s entirely possible that, in the long run, keeping him with the Lookouts better prepared him to be a major leaguer.
    If he comes close to keeping up these numbers, regardless of when he joined the club, there’s no way he’ll be denied ROY and MVP honors, and you can take that to the bank!

  2. doyersfan34 says:

    The All-Star game is for us fans and if plenty of us want him in there he should be there. But I also believe that Puig was brought up to the bigs at the right time, His timimg is perfect, if you know what I mean.

  3. CRANBROOK MIKE says:

    I gots my 50 wrote ins in!

  4. OldBrooklynFan says:

    I also wrote in Puig on my All-Star ballot. I’m glad I waited for a while to vote, this way I could include him.

  5. bigbluebird says:

    I don’t think I fault them for not truly believing he was ready even after his performance in spring training. This is not normal. He is not a normal talent. His is a big ball of energy who makes incredible mistakes and makes incredible plays all in the same inning. It is hard to know what to do unless you are willing to make a leap of faith. He is both incredibly “unseasoned” and incredibly talented in the same breath. It is hard to gauge that sort of talent let alone tossing the language barrier and his assimilation into US society with sudden fame. I am just happy that they gave him the chance when they did.

    As far as the resistance from others is concerned, Papelbon’s comments are a classic veteran response. They don’t like new blood coming up because some day that new blood is going to take your place – especially looking at someone who comes out of no where and makes it look so easy. There is resentment and jealousy from some veteran players who don’t have his talent and never will. This idea that you need to pay your dues in the ASG is a classic veteran response to new talent and the threat that he poses.

    Although I have voted now many times for Puig as a write in, it is almost impossible that he makes it to the top three OFs. But there is hope that he will be on the last chance reserve vote possibly against someone like Bryce Harper. MLB wants him to be there and that is where they have a direct voice.

    • Ron Cervenka says:

      An outstanding evaluation of the entire situation, Robb; and one that I agree with completely.

      I am frequently caught in the vortex between old-school baseball philosophies and the youth movement and tend to lean towards youth – as our good friend Bluenose Dodger will attest. I am a huge believer in the “sink or swim” mentality – how else will we ever know if these kids have what it takes or not?

      I more than understand Puig’s aggressiveness, which occasionally leads to incredibly dumb mistakes, but from the very first time I laid eyes on this kid (on August 14, 2012 to be exact), I knew immediately that he was special and that he very well might be the greatest baseball I have ever seen in my lifetime. It is undoubtedly this undeniable bias that I have for him that causes my resentment that he was not brought up sooner.

      And while I also agree with ebbetsfld that having Puig begin the season at Double-A Chattanooga was probably the right move, there is zero excuse for Luis Cruz not being DFA’d in May and Puig brought up at that time. This would have had him in the Bigs at nearly the exact same time frame that both Mike Trout and Bryce Harper were brought up a year earlier – and we ALL know how that worked out.

      Great comments – Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress