We all know it goes on. It is the unwritten rule of the baseball that no pitcher will directly acknowledge — everyone except for Cole Hamels that is. Hamels admitted last season that he intentionally hit Bryce Harper just a handful of games into his first major league season for basically being cocky and not yet earning his stripes.
This goes on and any player who admits to it in the media will be punished, as was Hamels who was suspended for 5 games thereafter. Hamels message was that rookies who get special treatment need to be put in their place. Veterans don’t like rookies coming up quickly and getting too much attention, whether you have done something directly to them or not. That is exactly what happened on Tuesday night to Yasiel Puig. The difference, however, was that Hamels plunked Harper in the back where a player is unlikely to be seriously injured, but on Tuesday evening, Arizona Diamondbacks right-hander Ian Kennedy could have ended Puig’s career before it ever started by hitting him in the face.
Yasiel Puig is undoubtedly a sensation. According to the LA Times, Puig merchandise is flying off the shelves at a pace faster than anyone in Dodger history, including the Mannywood or Fernando-mania era. He has been the intense focus of reporting in the media with comparisons to the all-time greats whether right or wrong. This doesn’t go unnoticed amongst other players. There is jealousy and an unwritten code that rookies need to behave in a certain way until they are established. Recently in the Atlanta series, Paul Maholm lashed back at a reporter who asked about Puig telling him not to put him in the Hall of Fame yet.
Puig was sent that same message last night by Ian Kennedy. Kennedy admitted that he was pitching inside on purpose and it just “got away.” In all seriousness, getting hit in the butt or in the back is “letting a pitch get away,” not at face level which can end a career or worse. These are professional pitchers with pinpoint control. The difference between in location is meaningful and can have horrible repercussions.
In a very transparent response, Zack Greinke hit Miguel Montero squarely in the back. This was a message directly to Montero who had to have called the pitch to Puig. Although this may seem trivial to the casual observer, this fact is very important – Greinke hit him in the back, not at face or shoulder level.
Greinke gets up to be bat in the 7th. With his first pitch Kennedy serves up a very high fast ball hitting Greinke on the front shoulder. Kennedy is immediately tossed. He doesn’t argue and casually walks off the field before the melee begins.
I know there will be some who say that both were at fault and that the Dodgers should not have responded (this part of baseball is a bit crude), but the difference between a belt or numbers-high fastball versus a shoulder or face-level bean ball is huge. What happened last night was not Kennedy letting one “get away.” Kennedy was dangerously putting a rookie in his place with a bean ball. Then he repeats it again with an equally dangerous pitch to Greinke. The Dodgers had a right to be very upset.
RT @Think_BlueLA: New post – Plunk, plunk, plunk!
Suspensions coming down later today. I just hope that they don’t happen during the Tuesday’s and Wednesday’s LAD vs. NYY games – I spent a lot of money to be here.
By the way – Ian Kennedy is a POS.
Throwing at hitters, regardless of any codes, is just plain dumb. Too much risk of injury and a sign the game has not matured. Having said that and knowing that it has and will happen, why don’t they hit the hitters in the backside? That location offers the least chance of injury and sends the message – “Stop acting like an ass.” – or has Ron mentioned POS.
You and I have debated this topic for years, Harold and we will never agree on it – which is perfectly fine. But the very beauty of the game (in my opinion) is that it has not matured – it is essentially exactly as it was over 130 years ago, which can’t be said about many things.
For me, the greatest time/era in baseball history was the 60’s. primarily because of guys like Don Drysdale and Bob Gibson who took care of business when it needed taking care of.
I agree with the backside thing, although my preference would be “between the numbers”, as Greinke did to Montero. The alternative would be what the great Vin Scully calls “Hitting him on the wallet”, as you suggest.
It is also my opinion that it you intentionally throw at a guy’s head (as Kennedy did to Greinke), that player should receive a minimum of a 50-game suspension. Throwing at someone’s head goes WAY beyond the Baseball Codes.
And Ian Kennedy should be afraid next time he comes to bat against the Dodgers… I’m just sayin’. It should be over… but that’s one which is still unsettled.
Suspensions just came down. Quick summary, kennedy 10 games, piug and greinke none. I think that says a lot of what Torre thought was going on.
Kennedy 10
Hinske 5
Schumaker 2
Maguire 2
Howell 2
Belisario 1
Mattingly 1
Gibson 1
I’m surprised. I think the Dodgers got off light with the suspensions.
Very happy that Puig only was fined. I guess MLB figured getting hit in the nose was punishment enough. I’m hoping that the Dodgers learned a valuable lesson here and that is they really need to watch Puig closely and not allow his temper to get the best of him. Mike Brito had told him to be on his best behavior and not argue with umpires, etc. Hopefully he continues and can keep all his actions being those positive ones on the playing field.